Engineering analysis

Microstructure Prediction

Estimate phase fractions and spatial gradients; compare simulation with metallography.

3D phase distribution

Candidate B · modeled section map

Martensite

91.4%

Bainite

6.8%

Retained γ

1.8%

Section profile

Surface → core

Target met

Surface96% M

Mid-radius92% M

Core86% M

Microstructure verdict

Core transformation remains within the current target envelope. Model uncertainty is higher at the center because historical core-cooling data is sparse.

Metallography AI

Upload microscope image for automated phase/defect assessment

Martensite estimate

89.2%

vision confidence 0.93

Grain size

ASTM 8.2

vision confidence 0.90

Microcrack

Not detected

vision confidence 0.96